In his blog post, Terry Godier reflects on a cautionary experience after realizing that a web utility he generated using Claude closely mirrored an existing open-source project. Taking full responsibility for the oversight, Godier redirected his domain directly to the original app, canceled plans for a mobile release, and pledged to avoid using hands-off AI generation for web projects going forward.
So, lesson to be remembered - people need to understand that "AI code" comes from somewhere and that somewhere might be someone else's hard (copyrighted even!) work.
firusvg (9d98b4) in Programmers • 6 days ago
Comments
Excellent point about it being someone else's work. Having contributed to open source, it can be a passion with little reward if you're building something only you end up liking.
Small push back on "oversight" though. Forking is the whole point of open source. You can take it and build under your own brand in two seconds. What went wrong isn't that he used the work, it's that he had no idea he was using it. No attribution, probably no license compliance, and no way to check.
That's the part I'd aim at the tools rather than at him. The models learned from repos with licenses attached and hand back the output with the provenance stripped off. There are gestures at fixing it, reference filters, some licensing deals, but nothing that tells you "this came from here, here's the license."
Disclosure: I build with AI daily, including this site, so I'm implicated in it too. The answer probably isn't to stop, it's to stop pretending the code came from nowhere.
Share